| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
02/12/2019 |
|
Actualizado : |
05/12/2019 |
|
Autor : |
INIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA).; IPA (INSTITUTO PLAN AGROPECUARIO). REGIONAL ESTE.; FUCREA (FEDERACIÓN URUGUAYA DE LOS GRUPOS CREA). |
|
Título : |
IV Jornada de economía. Los números de la ganadería. [Sitio Web]. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Treinta y Tres, (Uruguay): INIA, 2019. |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Notas : |
En el link se accede a las presentaciones realizadas por los disertantes. |
|
Contenido : |
PROGRAMA:
13:30 - 13:40 Apertura
13:40 - 14:20 Un destilado de resultados y perspectivas de empresas ganaderas. Carlos Molina, IPA.
14:20 - 14:50 Una manera distinta de mirar los resultados del ejercicio 2018-2019: mirando más allá del ingreso de capital. Gonzalo Ducós, FUCREA.
14:50 - 15:10 Condicionantes de la incorporación de tecnología en el sector ganadero. Enrique Fernández, INIA.
15:40 - 16:10 Estimación de los resultados de las explotaciones de la Encuesta Ganadera Nacional. José Bervejillo, Opypa - MGAP.
16:10 - 16:30 Eficiencia técnica y aspectos tecnológicos en los predios ganaderos. Federico García, Facultad de Agronomía, UDELAR.
16:30 - 17:00 Análisis económico de algunas tecnologías clave para la cría vacuna. Juan Manuel Soares de Lima, INIA.
17:00 -17:15 Reflexiones finales y cierre. Bruno Lanfranco, INIA |
|
Thesagro : |
ECONOMIA; GANADERIA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
URL : |
http://www.inia.uy/Paginas/IV-Jornada-de-economia---Los-numeros-de-la-ganaderia.aspx
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01509nam a2200169 a 4500
001 1060480
005 2019-12-05
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aINIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA).
245 $aIV Jornada de economía. Los números de la ganadería. [Sitio Web].$h[electronic resource]
260 $aTreinta y Tres, (Uruguay): INIA$c2019
500 $aEn el link se accede a las presentaciones realizadas por los disertantes.
520 $aPROGRAMA: 13:30 - 13:40 Apertura 13:40 - 14:20 Un destilado de resultados y perspectivas de empresas ganaderas. Carlos Molina, IPA. 14:20 - 14:50 Una manera distinta de mirar los resultados del ejercicio 2018-2019: mirando más allá del ingreso de capital. Gonzalo Ducós, FUCREA. 14:50 - 15:10 Condicionantes de la incorporación de tecnología en el sector ganadero. Enrique Fernández, INIA. 15:40 - 16:10 Estimación de los resultados de las explotaciones de la Encuesta Ganadera Nacional. José Bervejillo, Opypa - MGAP. 16:10 - 16:30 Eficiencia técnica y aspectos tecnológicos en los predios ganaderos. Federico García, Facultad de Agronomía, UDELAR. 16:30 - 17:00 Análisis económico de algunas tecnologías clave para la cría vacuna. Juan Manuel Soares de Lima, INIA. 17:00 -17:15 Reflexiones finales y cierre. Bruno Lanfranco, INIA
650 $aECONOMIA
650 $aGANADERIA
700 1 $aIPA (INSTITUTO PLAN AGROPECUARIO). REGIONAL ESTE.
700 1 $aFUCREA (FEDERACIÓN URUGUAYA DE LOS GRUPOS CREA).
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
23/05/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
23/03/2023 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CANOZZI, M.E.A.; MEDEROS, A.; TURNER, S.; MANTECA, X.; MCMANNUS, C.; MENEGASSI, S.R.; BARCELLOS, J.O. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; AMERICA ESTHER MEDEROS SILVEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SIMON TURNER, Animal and Veterinary Sciences Group, Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, UK.; XAVIER MANTECA, Department of Animal and Food Science, School of Veterinary Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.; CONCEPTA MCMANNUS, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brazil.; SILVIO RENATO MENEGASSI, Centre for Research on Production Systems and Beef Cattle Supply Chain (NESPro/UFRGS), Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.; JULIO OTÁVIO BARCELLOS, Centre for Research on Production Systems and Beef Cattle Supply Chain (NESPro/UFRGS), Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Dehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle: A meta-analysis. |
|
Complemento del título : |
Review. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal Production Science, 2019, Volume 59, Issue 5, p. 801-814. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17752 |
|
DOI : |
10.1071/AN17752 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
History Article: Received 27 January 2017 // accepted 11 April 2018 // published online 30 May 2018. -- Corresponding author: Barcellos, J.O.J.; Centre for Research on Production Systems and Beef Cattle Supply Chain (NESPro/UFRGS), Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande Do sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:julio.barcellos@ufrgs.br -- |
|
Contenido : |
Dehorning is a common practice in cattle farming. Researchers suggest that pain during dehorning can be mitigated, although there is no conclusive evidence about the best technique and the best manner of pain relief. A systematic review-meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of dehorning on welfare indicators (cortisol concentration or average daily gain [ADG] or vocalisation) in beef cattle up to 12 months of age. Five electronic databases were systematically searched, as well as conference proceedings and experts were contacted electronically. Pre-defined protocols were applied during all steps of the systematic review process. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. Four publications reporting 7 studies and 69 trials were included in the MA involving 287 cattle. Heterogeneity between studies was observed for cortisol (I2 = 50.5%), ADG (I2 = 70.5%), and vocalisation (I2 = 91.9%). When comparing the non-dehorned group with amputation dehorning, the cortisol concentration was lower 30 min (P < 0.0001) and 120 min (P = 0.023) after procedure (0.767 nmol/L and 0.680 nmol/L, respectively). Local anaesthesia did not show a reduction in cortisol concentration at 30 min after dehorning by amputation. Non-dehorned animals had a tendency to decrease the number of vocalisation (P = 0.081; MD = 0.929) compared with the group dehorned by amputation. These results suggest that dehorning is a painful experience and that local anaesthesia did not alleviate short-term pain following dehorning. Further investigation into pain relief is required to improve confident decision making under practical conditions. © 2019 CSIRO. MenosDehorning is a common practice in cattle farming. Researchers suggest that pain during dehorning can be mitigated, although there is no conclusive evidence about the best technique and the best manner of pain relief. A systematic review-meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of dehorning on welfare indicators (cortisol concentration or average daily gain [ADG] or vocalisation) in beef cattle up to 12 months of age. Five electronic databases were systematically searched, as well as conference proceedings and experts were contacted electronically. Pre-defined protocols were applied during all steps of the systematic review process. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. Four publications reporting 7 studies and 69 trials were included in the MA involving 287 cattle. Heterogeneity between studies was observed for cortisol (I2 = 50.5%), ADG (I2 = 70.5%), and vocalisation (I2 = 91.9%). When comparing the non-dehorned group with amputation dehorning, the cortisol concentration was lower 30 min (P < 0.0001) and 120 min (P = 0.023) after procedure (0.767 nmol/L and 0.680 nmol/L, respectively). Local anaesthesia did not show a reduction in cortisol concentration at 30 min after dehorning by amputation. Non-dehorned animals had a tendency to decrease the number of vocalisation (P = 0.081; MD = 0.929) compared with the group dehorned by amputation. These results suggest that dehorning is a pa... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ANIMAL ANALGESICS; ANIMAL PAIN; ANIMAL WELFARE; BEEF CATTLE; CATTLE. |
|
Thesagro : |
BIENESTAR ANIMAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02911naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1058621
005 2023-03-23
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1071/AN17752$2DOI
100 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A.
245 $aDehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle$bA meta-analysis.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
500 $aHistory Article: Received 27 January 2017 // accepted 11 April 2018 // published online 30 May 2018. -- Corresponding author: Barcellos, J.O.J.; Centre for Research on Production Systems and Beef Cattle Supply Chain (NESPro/UFRGS), Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande Do sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:julio.barcellos@ufrgs.br --
520 $aDehorning is a common practice in cattle farming. Researchers suggest that pain during dehorning can be mitigated, although there is no conclusive evidence about the best technique and the best manner of pain relief. A systematic review-meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of dehorning on welfare indicators (cortisol concentration or average daily gain [ADG] or vocalisation) in beef cattle up to 12 months of age. Five electronic databases were systematically searched, as well as conference proceedings and experts were contacted electronically. Pre-defined protocols were applied during all steps of the systematic review process. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. Four publications reporting 7 studies and 69 trials were included in the MA involving 287 cattle. Heterogeneity between studies was observed for cortisol (I2 = 50.5%), ADG (I2 = 70.5%), and vocalisation (I2 = 91.9%). When comparing the non-dehorned group with amputation dehorning, the cortisol concentration was lower 30 min (P < 0.0001) and 120 min (P = 0.023) after procedure (0.767 nmol/L and 0.680 nmol/L, respectively). Local anaesthesia did not show a reduction in cortisol concentration at 30 min after dehorning by amputation. Non-dehorned animals had a tendency to decrease the number of vocalisation (P = 0.081; MD = 0.929) compared with the group dehorned by amputation. These results suggest that dehorning is a painful experience and that local anaesthesia did not alleviate short-term pain following dehorning. Further investigation into pain relief is required to improve confident decision making under practical conditions. © 2019 CSIRO.
650 $aBIENESTAR ANIMAL
653 $aANIMAL ANALGESICS
653 $aANIMAL PAIN
653 $aANIMAL WELFARE
653 $aBEEF CATTLE
653 $aCATTLE
700 1 $aMEDEROS, A.
700 1 $aTURNER, S.
700 1 $aMANTECA, X.
700 1 $aMCMANNUS, C.
700 1 $aMENEGASSI, S.R.
700 1 $aBARCELLOS, J.O.
773 $tAnimal Production Science, 2019, Volume 59, Issue 5, p. 801-814. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17752
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
